In any organisation, stakeholders are the lifeblood, often determining the trajectory of projects, policies, or institutional success. However, not all stakeholders are cooperative or supportive. Some can be categorised as ‘recalcitrant’—those who resist change, are challengingto deal with, or are perpetually dissatisfied. Understanding and coping with such stakeholders is crucial for the stability and growth of any organisation, and the key to this is effective relationship management strategies.

A recalcitrant stakeholder is typically someone who persistently resists a company or institution’s policies, strategies, or decisions, regardless of the merits of those actions. They often challenge the status quo, refuse to adapt, and sometimes obstruct progress. Common characteristics include rigid resistance to change, distrust of leadership, negative influence on others, and reluctance to engage in constructive dialogue.

But why do stakeholders become obstinate? There are several reasons. Some may have had negative experiences with an organisation, leading to a lack of trust. Others may feel marginalised or ignored, believing their opinions weren’t sufficiently considered. Fear of change, particularly in industries undergoing rapid transformation, can make stakeholders feel vulnerable. Personal or political motivations may also fuel opposition.

Recalcitrant stakeholders, if not managed appropriately, can cause significant damage. They can harm an organisation’s reputation, slow down projects, or derail initiatives. Their influence can extend beyond their objections, rallying other stakeholders and creating divisions within the community. This resistance can lead to financial losses or legal complications in extreme cases as projects are delayed or scrapped. The potential damage they can cause is significant, underscoring the urgency of effective management.

Real-life examples of both successful and unsuccessful stakeholder management strategies can providevaluable insights. One notable success story is the construction of the Gautrain in South Africa. Despite fierce opposition from some communities and environmental groups, project leaders initiated ongoing dialogues with the affected parties. They organised public meetings, incorporated stakeholder suggestions where feasible, and addressed legitimate concerns. This strategy of inclusive dialogue and compromise not onlyeased tensions but also allowed the project to move forward with minimal resistance, demonstrating the potential for success in managing recalcitrant stakeholders and inspiring the audience with the possibilities.

On the other hand, the Marikana mining tragedy in 2012 is an example of poor stakeholder relations management. The lack of adequate engagement with striking miners, who had legitimate concerns about wages and working conditions, escalated tensions. Rather than adopting a more inclusive approach, the situation was met with force, leading to a deadly clash. This tragic outcome shows how neglecting stakeholder concerns can have severe consequences.

So, how can organisations deal with recalcitrant stakeholders? First, listen. Even if grievances seem unwarranted, opening channels for dialogue can diffuse tensions before they escalate. Next, transparency is critical. Being open and honest about the company’s intentions can disarm suspicions and build trust. Continuous engagement, not just during crises but as a regular part of operations, is also crucial. Regular meetings, project updates, and seeking feedback help stakeholders feel genuinely involved and valued. Instead of using force, influence can be more effective. Peer pressure, third-party mediators, or influencers within the community can help bring recalcitrant stakeholders into productive dialogue. Finally, offer solutions. Even when the organisation has done nothing wrong, offering compromises or new ways to address concerns can be more effective than simply justifying actions.

Dealing with recalcitrant stakeholders is difficult but possible. It requires not just patience and strategy but also empathy. Stakeholders need to feel heard, respected and included. By building trust, maintaining transparency, and continuously engaging, organisations can often transform resistance into cooperation, turning even the most challenging stakeholders into valuable partners. Empathy, understanding the stakeholders’ concerns and motivations, is a powerful tool in this process, making them feel respected and more likely to cooperate and underlining the importance of this understanding in the audience’s mind.

***
Thabang Chiloane is the Chairperson of the Institute for Stakeholder Relations in Southern Africa (ISRSA). He writes in his personal capacity.