In the unpredictable business world, catastrophes can strike anytime, from natural disasters and financial crises to data breaches and product recalls. How these events are communicated to stakeholders can significantly influence a company’s ability to navigate the situation effectively. This article explores the best practices for communicating impending catastrophes, highlighting examples of companies that have successfully managed such communications and those that have not, drawing out valuable lessons for future reference.
Catastrophes can take many forms. Natural disasters like earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes can disrupt operations, damage infrastructure, and endanger employees. Financial crises, including sudden downturns, bankruptcy, or significant losses, can threaten a company’s stability and investor confidence. Data breaches resulting from cyber-attacks can undermine trust and lead to legal and financial repercussions. Product recalls due to defects discovered after market release can damage reputations and incur significant costs. Regulatory changes with new laws or regulations can impact business operations and require immediate adjustments.
Examples of successful crisis communication include Johnson & Johnson’s 1982 Tylenol recall. Faced with cyanide poisoning incidents, the company swiftly recalled 31 million bottles of Tylenol, communicated openly with the public and stakeholders, and introduced tamper-evident packaging. Their transparent and proactive approach restored trust and saved the brand.
In 2018, Southwest Airlines experienced an engine failure that resulted in a passenger’s death. CEO Gary Kelly provided timely updates, expressed heartfelt condolences, and ensured affected passengers and their families received support. The company’s open communication and compassionate response-maintained stakeholder trust during a challenging time.
Conversely, BP’s handling of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill is a textbook example of poor crisis communication. The company was slow to respond, underestimated the spill’s magnitude, and appeared indifferent in its public statements. CEO Tony Hayward’s infamous remark, “I’d like my life back,” further damaged the company’s reputation, highlighting the importance of empathy and accountability in crises.
Equifax’s response to its massive 2017 data breach, which affected 147 million people, was widely criticised. The company delayed announcing the breach, provided insufficient information, and directed affected individuals to a problematic website. The lack of transparency and effective communication exacerbated public outrage and mistrust.
Prominent lessons on communicating catastrophes include being transparent and honest. Transparency builds trust; communicate what is known, what is unknown, and what steps are being taken to address the situation. Avoid downplaying the severity of the catastrophe, as this can lead to more significant backlash when the truth emerges. Act quickly, as prompt communication is crucial. Delays can lead to misinformation and increased anxiety among stakeholders. Quick, factual updates help maintain control of the narrative and reassure stakeholders that the company is actively managing the situation.
Empathy, shown by acknowledging the impact on those affected and expressing genuine concern, humanises the company and helps build emotional connections with stakeholders. Maintaining consistency in messages across all channels is vital to avoid confusion and eroded trust. Designate a spokesperson or a communication team to handle all inquiries and updates.
Preparation is key. Develop a crisis communication plan before a catastrophe occurs. This plan should outline roles, responsibilities, and communication procedures during a crisis, enabling a more organised and effective response. Engaging with all stakeholders by tailoring communications to address the specific needs of employees, customers, investors, and the public provides reassurance and builds confidence.
Communicating an impending catastrophe is a delicate balance between transparency and maintaining calm. By learning from successful and unsuccessful examples, companies can develop robust crisis communication strategies that protect their reputation, maintain stakeholder trust, and navigate the challenges effectively. In adversity, a company’s communication strength can distinguish between crisis and catastrophe.
***
Thabang Chiloane is the Chairperson of the Institute for Stakeholder Relations in Southern Africa (ISRSA). He writes in his personal capacity.