In 2021, this news portal published an article referencing a Visual Capitalist report that revealed just how much maps influence our daily lives. They don’t merely guide us from point A to B; they shape our sense of the world, our place within it, and even our assumptions about power. At the time, we highlighted how critics of the Mercator projection the most commonly used world map – have long warned that its distortions carry deep political and psychological consequences.
The Mercator map, designed in the 16th century for European navigation, is still the standard in classrooms, boardrooms, and even Google Maps. Yet it comes with a hidden bias: it inflates the size of northern nations such as Canada and Russia while compressing those along the equator. The result? Canada and Russia appear to sprawl across a quarter of the globe’s surface, when in truth they cover only about five percent.
This shows maps are not neutral. They are stories in two dimensions, shaping how we see the world and, more importantly, how we see ourselves. For centuries, the Mercator projection has dominated classrooms, atlases, and even our smartphone screens. Designed in the 16th century to aid European seafarers, its usefulness for navigation came at a heavy cost: it distorted the size of continents, inflating the North while diminishing the South.
Nowhere has this distortion been more damaging than with Africa. On the Mercator map, Africa appears modest in scale – a patch of land dwarfed by the likes of Greenland, Europe, and North America. In truth, Africa is colossal. It could contain the United States, China, India, Japan, and much of Europe combined. Yet this reality has been hidden in plain sight. The visual shrinking of Africa has subtly reinforced centuries-old narratives: that Africa is small, peripheral, and less significant.
This is not simply cartographic trivia. Visuals carry power. When a continent of over 1.4 billion people, vast resources, and immense cultural influence is persistently minimised on the world’s most widely used maps, the result is more than misperception – it is misbranding. The Mercator projection has, in effect, made brand Africa smaller than it is.
This distortion has never been a mere technicality. For generations, it has subtly shaped global consciousness. By making Africa appear small, marginal, and peripheral, the Mercator projection has fed into colonial narratives of insignificance. It has left Africa branded, at least visually, as a continent of limited weight, despite being home to 1.4 billion people, the youngest population on earth, and resources that will define the future of energy, food security, and climate resilience.
The African Union’s decision to endorse the campaign for accurate, true-size maps is therefore timely and strategic. Correcting the world’s image of Africa is not about cartographic pedantry – it is about reclaiming dignity, identity, and brand equity. When Africa is shown at its true scale, its importance is undeniable. It dwarfs Europe. It can contain China, the United States, India, and still have room to spare. This is the Africa of reality, not the Africa of distortion.
The implications for brand Africa are powerful. Accurate maps communicate Africa’s vast economic potential to investors, who often underestimate the scale of its markets. They underscore the continent’s central role in global geopolitics, particularly in climate negotiations and trade. They also reshape education: when young Africans see their continent depicted truthfully, they inherit a sense of pride and possibility rather than marginality.
1. Impact of the Mercator map on brand Africa
- Visual distortion of size and significance
The Mercator projection compresses regions near the equator and expands those closer to the poles. Africa, despite being the second largest continent and home to over 1.4 billion people, is visually diminished. Greenland and Canada often look as large – or larger – than Africa, when in reality Africa could fit Greenland in it about 14 times.
This “shrinking” on the map subconsciously reinforces outdated stereotypes of Africa as small, peripheral, and less significant.
- Perception of power and influence
Maps are tied to geopolitics. By inflating Europe and North America, the Mercator projection visually centers Western powers as dominant. Africa, meanwhile, is perceived as marginal—affecting how investors, policymakers, and even African youth perceive Africa’s place in the world.
- Colonial legacy in representation
The Mercator map was created in 1569, during the height of European colonial expansion. Its distortion unintentionally aligned with imperial narratives: Europe is large and central; Africa is small and subordinate. This has long reinforced the idea that Africa is “less than,” even in subconscious ways.
2. Why changing to true-size maps matters
- Restoring Africa’s visual dignity
True-to-scale projections like the Gall-Peters projection reveal Africa’s massive size. Africa is bigger than the U.S., China, India, Japan, and much of Europe combined. This challenges narratives of smallness and positions Africa as a continent of scale and importance.
- Psychological rebranding
When Africans see their continent depicted at its true size, it nurtures pride and reshapes self-perception. A confident, visually validated Africa strengthens “brand Africa” from within.
- Global perception shift
Investors, students, and policymakers outside Africa also internalize these visuals. Seeing Africa as vast and resource-rich underscores its importance in global trade, climate action, innovation, and cultural influence.
- Alignment with Africa’s agenda
The African Union’s endorsement of true-size maps ties directly to initiatives like Agenda 2063, which envisions an Africa that is strong, integrated, and respected globally. Accurate maps become a symbolic and practical step in reframing Africa’s role.
3. Positive results for brand Africa
- Economic confidence: A large, accurately represented Africa reinforces its image as an economic powerhouse in the making, with scale that attracts investment and trade.
- Cultural influence: True maps showcase Africa as a central, not peripheral, player in world history and civilisation.
- Geopolitical clout: A visual assertion of Africa’s size helps underscore its bargaining power in climate negotiations, peace and security talks, and global governance.
- Educational empowerment: Future generations of African learners will grow up with visuals that affirm their continent’s size and importance – shaping confident leaders and citizens.
That is why the African Union’s support for a campaign promoting true-to-scale maps is more than a symbolic gesture. It is a bold step in reclaiming Africa’s rightful place in the world’s imagination. When the Gall-Peters projection and other accurate representations are used, Africa is restored to its true size – a giant at the centre of global affairs, not an afterthought at the margins.
De/constructing brand Africa begins with imagination – with how we picture ourselves, and how the world pictures us. The shift from Mercator to true-size maps is more than visual correction; it is a psychological reset. It restores Africa to its rightful size and stature, not only on paper but also in the minds of the world.
It is long overdue for the world to stop seeing Africa through a distorted lens and to start seeing it as it truly is: vast, vital, and central to humanity’s shared future.
Tujenge Afrika Pamoja! Let’s Build Africa Together!
Enjoy your weekend.
Saul Molobi (FCIM)
PUBLISHER: JAMBO AFRICA ONLINE
and
Group Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Brandhill Africa™
Tel: +27 11 759 4297
Mobile: +27 83 635 7773
Physical Address: 1st Floor, Cradock Square Offices; 169 Oxford Road; Rosebank; JOHANNESBURG; 2196.
eMail: saul.molobi@brandhillafrica.com
Website: www.brandhillafrica.com
Social Media: Twitter / Instagram / LinkedIn / Facebook / YouTube / Jambo Africa Online / WhatsApp Group / 101.9 Chai FM